Wheels On Down the Road

Tag: US Politics

Explores the U.S. political landscape, democratic processes, and policy debates from local to national levels

  • A Revolution Remembered: 250 Years After the Shot Heard ’Round the World

    On April 19, 1775, British troops marched toward Concord to seize weapons. What they found instead was resistance. Ordinary farmers and tradesmen—Minutemen—stood their ground at Lexington. A single shot rang out. No one knows who fired it.

    But that one act of defiance became the spark that lit the American Revolution. That shot, the “shot heard ’round the world,” was not about war—it was about refusal. Refusal to be ruled without representation. Refusal to surrender liberty to unchecked power.

    Two hundred and fifty years later, we are again facing a moment of reckoning. Not with muskets, but with microphones. Not with bayonets, but with ballots and bold voices. The question before us now is the same one our founders asked themselves. Will we allow one person to dictate the future of the many?

    I am a disability advocate. I am deeply invested in civic participation. I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about what real representation looks like. I don’t just study history—I live its consequences. We can see the struggle when navigating inaccessible systems. We also witness it as democratic norms erode in real time. It’s clear that the fight for equity and accountability didn’t end in 1776. In fact, it’s happening right now.

    Today, in 2025, I find myself reflecting on that revolutionary spirit—and wondering how far we’ve strayed from its core principles.

    We now have a President who increasingly behaves as though he alone can decide what’s best for the country. He is circumventing the proper chain of constitutional authority. The office of the presidency is growing disturbingly monarchical. This change is due to sweeping executive orders and claims that other branches are “in the way.”

    What’s worse is that many in Congress, across both parties, are allowing it. The legislative branch should act as a check on power. Instead, it has become largely passive. This passivity enables the President to do whatever he sees fit.

    Even the judicial branch has begun picking and choosing which executive actions to confront, leaving accountability up to political whim. If the courts do rule against the President, there is a growing concern he may simply choose to ignore them. This is because the judiciary, for all its authority, has no enforcement power.

    If the executive no longer respects the rulings of the courts, democracy is not occurring. If the executive fails to adhere to the laws passed by Congress, democracy is not occurring. It is authoritarianism cloaked in American institutions.

    What the Constitution Actually Says

    Our government was deliberately designed to prevent this very kind of power consolidation. The Founders, having just fought a war to escape monarchy, built a system rooted in checks and balances.

    • Article I of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to make laws.
    • Article II outlines the duties of the executive branch, which is to enforce the laws—not to write them.
    • Article III gives the judiciary the power to interpret those laws.

    These three branches are meant to restrain each other, not serve one another. A President may issue executive orders, but those do not carry the same weight as laws passed by the legislature. They are meant to clarify enforcement—not create new legal frameworks.

    The Federalist Papers Warned Us

    Even in the 1780s, the Founders feared the possibility of executive overreach. In Federalist No. 47, James Madison famously wrote:

    “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands… may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.”

    And in Federalist No. 51, he reinforced the vital need for institutional limits on power:

    “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition… It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?”

    These weren’t just lofty ideals. They were warnings from men who had lived under unchecked rule—and refused to let it happen again.

    History Doesn’t Just Repeat—It Responds

    The Revolution wasn’t a one-time event. It was a stand for enduring principles: representative government, accountability, and the rule of law. Every time we allow a single branch—especially the executive—to override or ignore the others, we betray that legacy.

    This isn’t about party lines. It’s about constitutional lines. If we let any President, of any party, expand their authority unchecked, we risk transforming the presidency into something unrecognizable. Something we once fought to be free from.

    Real-World Example: Immigration and the Alien Enemies Act

    The most urgent and alarming example of executive overreach in 2025 is the revival of the Alien Enemies Act. This is an obscure law passed in 1798. It gives the President sweeping powers to detain or deport non-citizens from hostile nations during times of war.

    President Trump’s administration has invoked this law to target and deport Venezuelan migrants. Many of these migrants had legal status, including visas, humanitarian protections, or pending asylum claims.

    The justification? Alleged—but unproven—ties to criminal gangs or national security concerns. In many cases, these individuals were given no warning. No chance to contest the accusations. No hearings. No due process. Just detention and removal.

    The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and immigration advocates have challenged the policy in court. They argue it is a clear violation of the Constitution’s due process guarantees. Even the U.S. Supreme Court temporarily stepped in to block certain deportations.

    The larger concern remains: What if a President can ignore the courts? They could revoke legal visas and strip people of their rights with a signature. What protections are left then?

    This is not just an immigration issue. It’s a constitutional crisis. A President is using a 200+ year-old wartime law to unilaterally remove people. This occurs without oversight, without evidence, and without legal recourse. This action is exactly the kind of authoritarian overreach the Founders feared.

    Personal Reflection & Call to Action

    I advocate for marginalized communities. Rights can quickly be erased when those in power stop listening to the law. They start listening only to themselves. This moment isn’t about politics. It’s about people. And the systems that are supposed to protect them.

    To uphold the integrity of our democratic system, it’s imperative that we, as citizens, engage actively in the political process. This includes:

    • Advocacy: Contacting legislators to express concerns about executive overreach and urging them to assert their constitutional role in policy making.
    • Education: Staying informed about governmental actions and understanding their implications on various communities.
    • Participation: Voting in elections, attending town halls, and participating in public discourse to influence policy decisions.

    We the People Are Still the Safeguard

    We may not be standing on a battlefield. We may not hear the crack of muskets or the gallop of horses. But make no mistake: we are in the midst of a revolution.

    This one may not be started by a single shot—but it can be started by a louder voice.

    A voice that refuses silence. A voice that challenges overreach. A voice that demands the democracy we were promised.

    Our founders lit the fire of liberty with action. We must ensure it keeps burning. This requires awareness, advocacy, and an unwavering insistence that power must always serve the people—not rule them.

    Sources & References

    U.S. Constitution – Full Text: https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/

    Federalist No. 47 – James Madison: https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/text-41-50#s-lg-box-wrapper-25493412

    Federalist No. 51 – James Madison: https://guides.loc.gov/federalist-papers/text-51-60#s-lg-box-wrapper-25493413

    History.com – Lexington and Concord: https://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/battles-of-lexington-and-concord

    Vanity Fair – Deportations and the Alien Enemies Act: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/supreme-court-blocks-trumps-use-of-wartime-law-for-deportation

  • Here We Go Again

    I Hate Writing About This, But I Have To

    I don’t like talking about politics on social media, and I certainly don’t like writing about it here. But this isn’t about politics—it’s about livelihood.

    I feel like I’ve written this post a dozen times. I hate that I have to keep writing about government funding, budget cuts, and restructuring. I hate that every few months, I have to sit down and explain. Once again, I must clarify why Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid aren’t just line items on a budget. They are lifelines for millions of people, including myself.

    I wish I didn’t have to keep writing about this. I won’t stay silent until I am confident that my future is safe. The future of millions of others must also be safe for me to stay silent. Because the moment we stop speaking out, those in power believe they can do whatever they want.

    Why This Matters (Again)

    There’s talk of making deep cuts to Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Do I think it’ll happen? Maybe not to the extent being proposed, but the fact that it’s even a possibility is terrifying. Medicaid/Medicare is a life line for people like me.

    If it does happen, here’s what it means for me:

    • SSDI helps cover my portion of household bills and the costs of having a service dog. I work part-time, but last year, I made about $1,600 before taxes—not nearly enough to live on.
    • Medicare covers my $50,000 power wheelchair. If they slash funding, approvals for equipment and repairs could take months. If my chair breaks down, my independence is gone.
    • Medicare and Medicaid cover my PCA (Personal Care Assistant) hours. These hours help me conserve energy. This way, I can focus on things that bring me joy. Examples of these activities are writing and spending time with friends. If they take those hours away, I risk serious health consequences. Even a reduction means needing a shoulder replacement sooner rather than later.

    And then there’s Jason, my longtime PCA, who also relies on this income. If his hours are cut, he loses a major source of financial stability. That means losing our home. It’s that simple.

    This isn’t just about me. This is about millions of people—seniors, disabled folks, low-income families—who depend on these programs to survive.

    In a recent Disability Scoop post dated March 19, 2025, they tell the story of Xavier. He has a rare genetic immune disorder. It undermines his body’s ability to fight disease. California’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, provides Xavier with the treatments he needs. It offers resources to his family as well. This support helps him live as normal of a life as possible.

    His mother is quoted saying:

    “It’s allowed him to go to school. It’s allowed him to be home and not living in a hospital 24 hours a day,”

    Parents of children with special health care needs aren’t the only ones raising concerns about potential cuts. Disability advocates, health care providers, budget analysts, and state lawmakers have also voiced alarm. The House proposal passed on February 25 does not explicitly call for Medicaid cuts.

    Nonetheless, it instructs the House Energy and Commerce Committee. This committee oversees the program. It needs to find $880 billion in savings over the next decade. According to experts, reaching that level of savings would be nearly impossible without reducing Medicaid funding.

    I Hate Writing About This, But I Can’t Stop

    Every time I write about Social Security or Medicare or government cuts, I feel like a broken record. I’ve covered this before:

    And yet, here we are again.

    I wish I could stop writing about this. I wish I could move on. But I can’t. The second we stop talking about it, the people in power win. The moment we get exhausted and say “Oh well, nothing we can do,” they triumph.

    What Can We Do?

    • Talk about it.
      • Even if it feels repetitive, even if it’s exhausting—keep the conversation going.
    • Contact your legislators.
      • I know, I know—Congress is a mess. But if enough of us make noise, they have to listen.
    • Get your story out there.
      • Talk to the media.
      • Write to local newspapers.
      • Use social media.

    I don’t want to write another post like this in six days, in six weeks, or in six months. But if I have to, I will.

    Because this isn’t politics. This is life.

    Read More:

  • Left Behind by the Democrats

    Left Behind by the Democrats

    Over the past few months, I’ve written extensively about the changes unfolding in our government. I’ve also discussed their impact on our communities.

    There have been drastic budget cuts to Social Security. There is also an urgent need for reform in Minnesota’s disability services. I’ve delved into the pressing issues that affect us all. I’ve also explored the challenges faced by the LGBTQIA+ community, highlighting the growing need for advocacy and support.

    Amid these discussions, I’ve felt an increasing urge to share more of my personal story. Shortly after the 2024 presidential election, I wrote a piece that I wasn’t quite ready to publish. It was raw, emotional, and an honest reflection on feeling left behind by the Democratic Party. While I shared it with a few close friends, I hesitated to make it public. I wasn’t sure how it would be received—and, frankly, I wasn’t ready for the potential backlash.

    I continue writing about the state of our nation and the impacts of policy changes on disability support services. I realize that my personal story is an essential part of this broader conversation.

    The emotions I felt in November 2024 still resonate. They affect not just me but many others too. These emotions reach those who feel disconnected, disillusioned, and left behind.

    Today, I’m ready to share this piece with you. I’ve made some edits to improve readability and included links to cited sources. My hope is that it resonates with you. I wish it sparks meaningful conversations. I also hope it encourages all of us to think critically about the direction we’re headed as a country.

    Left Behind by the Democrats

    A Personal Reflection on the Democratic Party’s Disconnect and the Fight for Our Rights

    By Levi Dokken | November 7, 2024

    I have been sitting here with a lot of feelings—sadness, anger, even rage. Part of me wanted to lash out at the people who voted for Donald Trump. To work through these emotions, I felt the need to sit down and write.

    Writing helps me release emotions. It allows me to express my thoughts. By expressing them, they don’t consume me.

    The Disconnect Between the Democratic Party and Rural America

    Donald Trump has won, and I believe it’s because the Democrats failed. They have failed the people they claim to represent. They are no longer the party of working men and women. Just look at the state of Minnesota. It went for Harris but is still a sea of red. There is only a small island of blue. The party only focuses on the areas where they need electoral votes to win the overall race.

    I grew up in a small town in Minnesota. I saw firsthand that most people in my community weren’t necessarily concerned with national politics.

    They focused more on day-to-day struggles. They were figuring out how to put food on the table. They were also finding money to cover the mortgage. They worried about what to do if their child needed braces and health insurance didn’t cover it.

    Candidates campaigned across the United States. They focused primarily on so-called battleground states and urban areas. They believed these areas would secure enough votes for them.

    Small towns across the nation increasingly feel disconnected from the Democratic Party. They believe the party has shifted its focus toward urban and coastal issues. This shift comes at the expense of rural communities.

    The Electoral System: A Barrier to Representation

    I often wonder if political candidates would pay more attention to smaller towns if votes were delegated differently. They might also focus on smaller states.

    Our current electoral system feels outdated. It resembles a relic of an age long since dead. In it, the voices of a few battleground states dictate the direction of the entire country.

    What if we had a more localized electoral college system within each state?

    For example, if each county were assigned an electoral vote, it might create a more balanced representation. The majority vote within a county would decide how that county’s electoral vote was cast. This system could offer an option to the current popular vote system that most states use to assign their delegates.

    Disappointment with Democratic Leadership

    Joe Biden announced he was running for a second term. I had a strong feeling he was going to lose.

    In 2020, he claimed he would be a transitional president. What happened to that promise? He was unwilling to even hold a primary. I was much more enthusiastic about the possibility of MN Rep. Dean Phillips entering the race. The Democrats, however, dismissed it, holding fast to the tradition that the incumbent automatically runs for re-election.

    Watching the first presidential debate, I was floored. Both candidates seemed unfit to hold the highest office in the land.

    Biden stumbled with his words and thoughts; at times, he seemed unable to keep his ideas in order. Trump wasn’t much better—he mostly rehashed grievances from 2020 without offering a clear plan for change.

    Project 2025: A Threat to Disability Rights

    Project 2025 adds to my concern. It is a plan from The Heritage Foundation. The next administration might choose to implement it.

    According to the Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, this plan proposes changes with deep impacts on programs like Medicaid. It introduces funding caps, stricter eligibility requirements, and time limits.

    These changes could drastically reduce access to essential services for people with disabilities. Services like medical equipment, personal care attendants (PCAs), and specialist visits are crucial. They are necessary for maintaining health and independence.

    For me, Medicaid covers my specialist visits. It also covers my nearly $50,000 power wheelchair and repairs. Additionally, it covers the cost of my partner, Jason, as my PCA.

    How Do We Talk to Those Who Voted for Trump?

    How do I talk to my friends and family who voted for Donald Trump? How do I understand their choice to support someone who has assaulted women? He attempted to overturn a fair election. He also incited his supporters to storm the Capitol.

    Some of Trump’s supporters hold harmful views. However, I believe most are simply scared, misinformed, or longing for a past they believe he can bring back.

    I don’t want to cut these people out of my life, especially when many are lifelong friends or family. We can still be connected; we just may not talk about politics.

    What Can I Do Moving Forward?

    I’ve shared many things with you. The Democratic Party’s disconnect from rural America is concerning. Our electoral system has flaws. Policies like Project 2025 carry potential consequences. There’s a growing divide among friends and family. I can’t help but feel a mix of frustration and overwhelm.

    The future feels uncertain. These decisions could have long-lasting effects. They could also have life-changing effects for myself and those I care about. I find myself sitting here after writing this, asking myself, What can I do?

    As one voice out of millions, not much. But I can be part of something bigger. When others raise their voices against the incoming administration’s policies, I can stand with them. I can support the women in my life, the friends who feel vulnerable right now. I can do my part, however small, to work toward a future that protects everyone’s rights and dignity.

    Will you join me?

    Sources

  • When Budget Cuts Hit Home: How Social Security Reductions Are Impacting Us All

    Social Security Is More Than a Government Program

    Social Security isn’t just a government program; for many, it’s a lifeline.

    I’ve been receiving Social Security benefits in one form or another since I turned 18. Initially, I relied on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) while attending college from 2002 to 2008. It gave me a freedom many going through college don’t have. I was able to have a reliable source of income so I could focus higher education.

    When I entered the workforce in the winter of 2009, I found stable and reliable work. This job allowed me to completely eliminate my need for Social Security assistance.

    Later, after leaving my job at Best Buy in 2018, I transitioned to Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits. These services are vital—not just for me but for millions of Americans who depend on them for independence and stability.

    Why I’m Speaking Up Now

    I felt compelled to write this piece after watching The Rachel Maddow Show last night. Maddow discussed the potential fallout from the latest budget cuts to the Social Security Administration (SSA). These cuts, led by Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under President Trump, go beyond budget trimming. Entire programs are being eliminated, putting vulnerable populations at serious risk.

    According to a recent Washington Post article, the acting head of the SSA privately admitted to certain outcomes. He said these cuts would likely lead to more mistakes. They might also result in longer delays in processing claims. The possibility of an even more frayed safety net is alarming, and I couldn’t sit by quietly.

    The Human Impact of Bureaucratic Delays

    These cuts won’t just affect new applicants—they could impact those of us already receiving benefits. Whether it’s renewing benefits, updating personal information, or resolving administrative issues, interactions with the SSA are often necessary.

    When the system is underfunded and overwhelmed, routine tasks can become significant obstacles. Delays and mistakes in processing claims can lead to missed payments, prolonged appeals, and devastating financial consequences.

    Real Stories, Real Consequences

    It might be difficult to grasp the real-world impact of bureaucratic slowdowns. This is especially true for those who have never had to navigate this system.

    When I applied for SSDI in 2018, the process was far from smooth. Even with a fully staffed administration, the hurdles were significant. Now imagine facing these challenges with fewer resources, fewer programs, and more errors.

    These challenges are not just theoretical. They are a looming reality for millions of Americans. Many Americans rely on Social Security as a cornerstone of their financial stability.

    Connect the Dots: More on Disability Rights and Advocacy

    If you want to understand more about the broader challenges facing people with disabilities, check out some of my previous posts:

    These stories illustrate the ongoing struggle to maintain and expand the rights and services many of us rely on. The fight against these latest budget cuts is just one part of a larger battle.

    A Call for Accountability and Action

    We need transparency and a commitment from our leaders to prioritize the needs of vulnerable populations. Budget cuts might look good on a spreadsheet, but their impact on human lives can be catastrophic. We should invest in essential services. This ensures that everyone—regardless of their circumstances—has access to the support they need.

    Advocacy Starts with Awareness

    The first step in fighting these cuts is raising awareness. Share your stories, support advocacy groups, and reach out to your representatives. If we remain silent, these cuts could become just another line item in a budget. The true cost would be paid by those who can least afford it.

    Sources

  • LGBTQIA+ Community Under Attack

    LGBTQIA+ Community Under Attack

    The first days of any presidency set the tone for the administration’s priorities. For President Donald Trump’s return to office, that tone has been clear—an outright attack on LGBTQIA+ rights. From executive orders restricting gender identity recognition to questionable leadership appointments, his policies are already harming individuals in my community. As someone who values equality and dignity for all, I cannot stay silent.

    Erasing Gender Identity: A Blow to Trans Rights

    One of Trump’s first executive orders has a controversial title. It is titled Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government. It mandates that all federal documents must reflect an individual’s sex assigned at birth. This effectively strips away recognition and rights for transgender Americans at the federal level.

    The real-world consequences of this policy are devastating. Euphoria star Hunter Schafer recently shared a troubling experience. Her newly issued passport listed her gender as male.

    This happened despite her legal documentation reflecting her gender as female for years. This is not just an inconvenience. It is an erasure of identity. This act could lead to further discrimination or challenges in travel, employment, and everyday life.

    A Culture War in the Arts: The Kennedy Center Controversy

    Trump’s influence extends beyond policy it reaches into the cultural fabric of the nation. Trump appointed Richard Grenell as executive director of the Kennedy Center. This appointment quickly led to Trump’s own placement as chairman of the board.

    Shortly after, the Kennedy Center canceled a Pride performance featuring the Gay Men’s Chorus of Washington. The official stance claims the decision preceded Trump’s takeover. It was due to scheduling and financial issues. Skepticism is warranted based on past social media posts by President Trump.

    Trump made a post on his social media platform, Truth Social, on February 7, 2025. This post only fuels doubts about the real motivations behind this decision.

    The message is clear: spaces that once championed inclusiveness and diversity are being reshaped to fit a restrictive, exclusionary agenda. The LGBTQIA+ community is being pushed aside, told that our voices, stories, and identities are no longer welcome.

    What Can We Do?

    Living in Minnesota, a predominantly Democratic-led state, I am fortunate to have leadership that will likely resist these harmful policies. However, that does not mean I can be complacent. National-level attacks require a national response. Here are some ways I—and anyone who shares these concerns—can take action:

    Call and Write to Federal Representatives

    State leadership may resist these policies. However, our federal representatives still play a critical role. Contact senators and members of Congress to demand that they take a stand against these executive orders.

    Support Advocacy Organizations

    Groups like the ACLU, Human Rights Campaign, and National Center for Transgender Equality are fighting these policies. They are taking legal action in court. They are challenging these policies through legal means. Donations, volunteering, and spreading awareness can help them continue their work.

    Amplify Voices of Those Affected

    The stories of transgender individuals and LGBTQIA+ artists being impacted by these policies need to be heard. Sharing their experiences on social media, engaging in discussions, and supporting LGBTQIA+ creators can help push back against this erasure.

    Vote and Encourage Voter Registration

    The 2026 midterm elections will be crucial. Ensuring that pro-equality candidates take office is one of the most effective ways to push back against harmful policies.

    Use My Platform

    Wheels On Down the Road was created to foster open discussion, and now is the time to use it. I can contribute to the national conversation by writing, sharing, and engaging with others. I can also push back against this administration’s regressive agenda.

    Final Thoughts

    The fight for LGBTQIA+ rights is far from over. The setbacks we face today will require resilience. Unity and action are also needed. Trump’s policies attempt to erase identities, silence voices, and dismantle progress. But we are still here. We are still fighting.

    I refuse to let this administration dictate the value of people in my community. Now is the time to stand up, speak out, and take action.

    Sources:

    Trump, D. J. (2025, January 20). Defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government. The White House. Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/

    Yurcaba, J. (2025, February 10). ‘Euphoria’ star Hunter Schafer issued male passport due to Trump’s policy. NBC News. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/euphoria-star-hunter-schafer-issued-male-passport-rcna193212

    Wilkie, C. (2025, February 12). Kennedy Center cancels Pride performance featuring Gay Men’s Chorus of Washington. The Hill. Retrieved from https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5154147-kennedy-center-cancels-gay-chorus-performance/

    Trump, D. J. (2025, February 7). Post on Truth Social. Retrieved from https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113964959500715895

  • Accessible Air Travel Threatened

    Accessible Air Travel Threatened

    Accessible air travel should be a right, not a privilege. However, for wheelchair users, flying can be a nightmare due to frequent mishandling of mobility devices. Every trip comes with an underlying fear: Will my wheelchair make it in one piece?

    Unlike lost luggage, a damaged or broken wheelchair isn’t just an inconvenience. It can mean losing mobility and independence. It may even cause someone to miss out on travel altogether.

    Recently, the Department of Transportation (DOT) introduced regulations to address these issues. These rules aim to hold airlines accountable for how they handle mobility devices. However, instead of embracing these improvements, major U.S. airlines are pushing back, trying to roll back these critical protections.

    If they succeed, it won’t just affect disabled travelers today. It could also set a precedent. Such a precedent would make future accessible air travel even harder to achieve.

    What the Biden-Era Regulations Do to Improve Accessible Air Travel

    To improve air travel for disabled passengers, the DOT introduced several new requirements. Specifically, these regulations require airlines to:

    • Improve training for airline personnel and contractors handling wheelchairs.
    • Provide real-time tracking of mobility devices during loading and unloading.
    • Be held accountable for damages or mishandling of essential mobility equipment.

    The Reality of Flying as a Wheelchair User: Why Accessible Air Travel Matters

    For wheelchair users, air travel often comes with unnecessary risks. If a power wheelchair is lost or damaged, the consequences are severe. It is not just a minor setback. It can leave someone stranded without mobility. Unlike suitcases, mobility devices are custom-fitted for their users, meaning repairs or replacements can take weeks or even months.

    For this reason, I personally avoid flying whenever possible. For instance, when I traveled to Seattle for a cruise, I took Amtrak. I chose it instead of flying because I couldn’t take the chance that my wheelchair would arrive damaged. If that had happened, I wouldn’t have been able to board the ship or enjoy my trip.

    No one should have to plan their travel around whether an airline will handle their essential mobility device properly.

    A Dangerous Slippery Slope for Accessible Air Travel

    Unfortunately, if airlines succeed in overturning these regulations, it could open the door for them. They may challenge other crucial accessibility improvements. This would make an already difficult travel experience even worse for disabled passengers. Some of the improvements currently under discussion include:

    • More wheelchair-accessible airplane bathrooms, which would allow passengers with disabilities to use the restroom without unnecessary struggle.
    • In-cabin wheelchair seating would allow wheelchair users to remain in their chairs. This prevents the need to store them below the plane, where damage is likely.

    If airlines succeed in rolling back current protections, they may argue that future accessibility improvements are too costly or inconvenient. This is why it is essential to push back now.

    How You Can Take Action to Protect Accessible Air Travel

    • Stay informed. Follow updates on DOT regulations and share information widely.
    • Speak out. If you or someone you know has experienced issues with airline accessibility, share your story with me here.
    • Contact your representatives. Advocate for stronger disability rights in air travel to prevent airlines from rolling back accessibility improvements.

    Disability Advocacy Groups Fighting for Change

    Sources

    Disclosure: The feature image for this article was AI-generated. Key phrases from this post were used to create a visual representation of the topic.

  • Republican Accountability: Lost in the Trump Era

    Republican Accountability: Lost in the Trump Era

    The Transformation of the Republican Party Under Trump

    The Republican Party has undergone a dramatic transformation under President Donald Trump’s leadership. The GOP once championed conservative values such as limited government, fiscal responsibility, and national security. Now, it is defined by unwavering loyalty to one man. This shift has left many questioning whether Republican accountability still exists in the Trump era.

    Glenn Youngkin: A Case Study in Republican Silence

    One of the clearest examples of this phenomenon is Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin. Youngkin initially positioned himself as a pragmatic Republican, someone who could appeal to both traditional conservatives and Trump’s base. However, his silence on Trump’s economic policies, which are now directly harming Virginia, proves otherwise.

    Trump’s administration has implemented policies affecting federal employment, an industry vital to Virginia’s economy. Federal job cuts threaten thousands of workers, yet Youngkin refuses to speak out against the very policies harming his constituents. His inaction shows a broader trend. Republican leaders prioritize staying in Trump’s good graces. They do this over protecting their own states. Source: Washington Post

    What Happened to Republican Accountability?

    The contrast between today’s Republican Party and the one that existed during the Watergate era is striking. When Richard Nixon was caught in a scandal, Republicans had the integrity to hold him accountable, forcing his resignation. Today, that accountability is nonexistent.

    Foreign Policy and the Shift Away From Conservative Principles

    Beyond domestic policy, Trump’s influence has significantly altered Republican foreign policy. The party that once strongly supported U.S. allies, including Ukraine, has now adopted Trump’s “America First” agenda, which often prioritizes isolationism over global leadership.

    Why Republicans Fear Standing Up to Trump

    The core reason Republican politicians refuse to challenge Trump is fear. The threat of being forced into primaries, ostracized, or even targeted by Trump’s most extreme supporters keeps them in line. It’s no longer about what’s best for the country. It’s no longer about their constituents. It’s about political survival in a party where dissent is punished.

    The Consequences of Continued Submission

    Until Republican leaders regain the courage to prioritize governance over personal loyalty, the party will remain in Trump’s shadow. The longer they wait to reclaim their independence, the more damage they will cause. This harm would affect not just their party, but the nation as a whole.

    Sources

    Disclosure: The feature image for this article was AI-generated. Key phrases from this post were used to create a visual representation of the topic.